Skip to Content

Changes for page Desktop Waterjet Cutting

Last modified by Zaara Hashmy on 2026/03/16 19:22
From version 12.3
edited by Zaara Hashmy
on 2026/03/16 19:20
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 12.4
edited by Zaara Hashmy
on 2026/03/16 19:22
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -15,11 +15,9 @@
15 15  )))|(% style="width:376px" %)(((
16 16  4,600 psi
17 17  
18 -
19 19  (317 bar)
20 20  )))|(% style="width:307px" %)0.45 GPM
21 -(1.7 L/min)
22 -\\(at 4,000 psi)
20 +(1.7 L/min).  (at 4,000 psi)
23 23  
24 24  
25 25  
... ... @@ -37,9 +37,8 @@
37 37  
38 38  **Disadvantages: (needs to be edited still) **
39 39  
40 -* Waterjet cutting is generally **slower than laser cutting**, especially for thinner materials.
41 -* The equipment and operation costs can be **high**, particularly due to maintenance and abrasive material use (e.g., garnet).
42 -* There can be a **taper (slight angle) in the cut**, especially in thicker materials, affecting edge perpendicularity.
38 +* Waterjet cutting is generally** **slower than laser cutting, especially for thinner materials.
39 +* There can be a taper (slight angle) in the cut, especially in thicker materials, affecting edge perpendicularity.
43 43  
44 44  = Software and Usage Instructions =
45 45