Skip to Content

Changes for page Desktop Waterjet Cutting

Last modified by Zaara Hashmy on 2026/03/16 19:22
From version 12.4
edited by Zaara Hashmy
on 2026/03/16 19:22
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 12.3
edited by Zaara Hashmy
on 2026/03/16 19:20
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -15,9 +15,11 @@
15 15  )))|(% style="width:376px" %)(((
16 16  4,600 psi
17 17  
18 +
18 18  (317 bar)
19 19  )))|(% style="width:307px" %)0.45 GPM
20 -(1.7 L/min).  (at 4,000 psi)
21 +(1.7 L/min)
22 +\\(at 4,000 psi)
21 21  
22 22  
23 23  
... ... @@ -35,8 +35,9 @@
35 35  
36 36  **Disadvantages: (needs to be edited still) **
37 37  
38 -* Waterjet cutting is generally** **slower than laser cutting, especially for thinner materials.
39 -* There can be a taper (slight angle) in the cut, especially in thicker materials, affecting edge perpendicularity.
40 +* Waterjet cutting is generally **slower than laser cutting**, especially for thinner materials.
41 +* The equipment and operation costs can be **high**, particularly due to maintenance and abrasive material use (e.g., garnet).
42 +* There can be a **taper (slight angle) in the cut**, especially in thicker materials, affecting edge perpendicularity.
40 40  
41 41  = Software and Usage Instructions =
42 42